ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Using baseline MRI radiomic features to predict the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in Alzheimer's patients.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is uncertain at baseline. Herein, we aimed to investigate whether radiomic features from the pre-treatment MRI data could predict rTMS efficacy for AD treatment. Out of 110 participants with AD in the active (n = 75) and sham (n = 35) rTMS treatment groups having T1-weighted brain MRI data, we had two groups of responders (active = 55 and sham = 24) and non-responders (active = 20 and sham = 11). We extracted histogram-based radiomic features from MRI data using 3D Slicer software; the most important features were selected utilizing a combination of a two-sample t-test, correlation test, least absolute shrinkage, and selection operator. The support vector machine classified rTMS responders and non-responders with a cross-validated mean accuracy/AUC of 81.9%/90.0% in the active group and 87.4%/95.8% in the sham group. Further, the radiomic features of the active group significantly correlated with participants' AD assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) change after treatment (false discovery rate corrected p < 0.05). Given that baseline radiomic features were able to accurately predict AD patients' responses to rTMS treatment, these radiomic features warrant further investigation for personalizing AD therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40335871What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.