Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40335869›Full record

ReviewTropical animal health and production2025

A review on the potential use of eubiotics in non-chicken poultry species.

Caven M Mnisi, Felix M Njeri, Anderson N Maina, Paul K Waliaula, Veronica Cheng, Indibabale Kumalo, Chidozie F Egbu, Elijah G Kiarie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Caven M MnisiFood Security and Safety Niche Area, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Science, North-West University, Private Bag x2046, Mmabatho, 2735, South Africa. kenny.mnisi@nwu.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1385-1093
Felix M NjeriDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2 W1, Canada.
Anderson N MainaFood Security and Safety Niche Area, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Science, North-West University, Private Bag x2046, Mmabatho, 2735, South Africa.
Paul K WaliaulaDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2 W1, Canada.
Veronica ChengDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2 W1, Canada.
Indibabale KumaloFood Security and Safety Niche Area, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Science, North-West University, Private Bag x2046, Mmabatho, 2735, South Africa.
Chidozie F EgbuFood Security and Safety Niche Area, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Science, North-West University, Private Bag x2046, Mmabatho, 2735, South Africa.
Elijah G KiarieFood Security and Safety Niche Area, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Science, North-West University, Private Bag x2046, Mmabatho, 2735, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the demand for poultry products increases, safe nutritional measures should be implemented to ensure successful diversification of the poultry industry with non-chicken poultry (NCP) species such as quail, turkey, ostrich, waterfowls, and guinea fowls. Thus, this review focuses on the current and future utility of eubiotics in NCP species by outlining the challenges and potential benefits that are associated with their utilization. Eubiotics are a group of feed additives, including probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, organic acids, and essential oils, that are safe and exhibit antimicrobial and immunomodulatory activities, prudent in an era where multi-drug antimicrobial resistance poses a grave threat to human health. Using eubiotics, separately or in combination, in NCP diets could enhance gut health, immune responses, growth performance, and product quality. However, their mechanisms of action are not fully understood, and their synergistic effects are not clearly outlined especially for NCP species. Moreover, inconsistent results have been reported, possibly due to various sources, application methods, production systems, bird types, and variations in rearing sites (macro- and micro-climatic conditions). We postulate that their extensive adoption in diets of NCP species could, in the future, deliver safe, efficient, and sustainable poultry production systems. We conclude that correct application methods, optimal dosages, and understanding of their synergistic actions could ensure alternative poultry systems that would contribute significantly to global food safety and nutrition security.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryPoultryPrebioticsAnimal FeedAnimalsDietProbioticsPrebioticsFeed additivesFood safetyGut healthPerformancePoultry

Identifiers

PMID40335869
PMCPMC12058837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.