ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2025
Evaluation of a care pathway for older adults presenting with nonspecific complaints at the emergency department: a before-and-after study.
Article in European geriatric medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The clinical frailty scale score in older persons (≥ 65 years) admitted via the emergency department: a prospective cohort study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeManaging older patients presenting at the Emergency Department (ED) poses challenges due to their predisposition to present with nonspecific complaints (NSC). With an ageing population and ED overcrowding, significance of NSC is expected to grow. Therefore, we implemented a structured care pathway to address the complexity of NSC presentations. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectivity of this care pathway.
methodsWe conducted a before-and-after study to evaluate the NSC care pathway, which included risk stratification, standardized assessment and diagnostic measurements. A control group receiving standard care was established in two hospitals (hospital 1 and 2) before implementation. Patient enrollment occurred from April 2021 to November 2024. Outcomes included length of stay in the ED (LOS-ED) and in hospital (LOS-H), revisits, diagnostic completeness (i.e. 100% agreement between all ED and hospital discharge diagnoses) and perceived quality of care.
resultsIn total, 164 control and 235 intervention patients were included in this study. Median LOS-ED and LOS-H did not show significant differences between the control and intervention patients. Implementation of the care pathway showed non-significant trends towards improved diagnostic completeness (47.1% vs 37.2%, p = 0.096). This might be associated with the non-significant observed decrease in 30-day readmissions (7.5% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.256). Patient-reported outcomes indicated a positive experience with the quality of care.
conclusionThe care pathway did not improve LOS-ED and LOS-H as hypothesized, possibly due to logistical barriers and patient variability. However, trends suggested improved diagnostic completeness and fewer 30-day readmission rates. Further research initiatives are needed to enhance patient outcomes and care for NSC patients. TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: NL8960, date 9-10-2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.