ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis of esophageal subepithelial lesions.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Based Multimodal Diagnosis of a Rare Intramural Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is one of the most accurate methods for determining the originating layer of subepithelial lesions (SELs). However, the accuracy is greatly influenced by the expertise and proficiency of the endoscopist. In this study, we aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to identify the originating layer of SELs in the esophagus and evaluate its efficacy.
methodsA total of 1445 cases of esophageal SELs were used to develop the model. An AI model stemming from YOLOv8s-seg and MobileNetv2 was developed to detect esophageal lesions and identify the originating layer. Two seniors and two junior endoscopists independently diagnosed the same test set.
resultsThe precision, recall, mean average precision @ 0.5, and F1-score of the AI model were 92.2%, 73.6%, 0.832, and 81.9%, respectively. The overall accuracy of the originating layer recognition model was 55.2%. The F1-scores of the second, third, and fourth layers were 47.1%, 51.7%, and 66.1%, respectively. The accuracy of the AI system in differentiating layers 2 and 3 from four was 76.5% and was similar to that of senior endoscopists (74.9-79.8%, P = 0.585) but higher than that of junior endoscopists (65.6-66.7%, P = 0.045).
conclusionsThe EUS-AI model has shown high diagnostic potential for detecting esophageal SELs and identifying their originating layers. EUS-AI has the potential to enhance the diagnostic ability of junior endoscopists in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.