ReviewPituitary2025
Consensus and controversies about diagnosing GH deficiency: a Delphi survey by the GH research society.
Review in Pituitary, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Insulin Tolerance Test in Adult GH Deficiency: An Exploratory Study Deriving BMI-Dependent Cut-Offs Using a Clinical Reference Standard.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Variability in the management of healthy short youth following GH stimulation testing.Endocrines · 2026Article
- GH Stimulation testing is unnecessary in patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disease, preserved pituitary function, and IGF-I SDS ≥ 0.Pituitary · 2026Article
- Observational
- Growth hormone retesting for idiopathic isolated growth hormone deficiency during and after puberty: a systematic review.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Review
- An update on hypophysitis.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2026Review
- Neuroendocrine and neural control of bone mass in health and disease.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Value of Peak-to-Basal Difference or Ratio of Growth Hormone in Children with Growth Hormone DeficiencyJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of temporal muscle thickness in subjects with acromegaly: a follow-up study.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Article
- Authors' reply to the letter "Should children born small for gestational age without catch-up growth be tested for growth hormone deficiency?"Pituitary · 2025Article
- Should children born small for gestational age without catch-up growth be tested for growth hormone deficiency?Pituitary · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
44 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBiochemical tests are required for diagnosing GH-deficiency in children and adults, but controversies remain regarding diagnostic criteria and type of biochemical tests. The aim of the study is to map the clinical practices of GHD diagnosis in children and adults.
methodsThe Growth Hormone Research Society members initiated a Delphi survey of the diagnosis of GHD in children and adults. Pediatric (n = 18) and adult (n = 25) endocrinologists from 14 countries participated and rated their extent of agreement with 61 statements using a Likert-type-scale (1-7). Consensus was predefined as ≥ 80% of panelists rating their agreement unidirectionally as either ≥ 5 (agreement) or ≤ 3 (disagreement).
resultsThe pediatric panel reached consensus on 17 of 29 (59%) statements on diagnosis in children, whereas the adult panel reached consensus on 28 of 32 (88%) statements on adult patients. There was general agreement to test for GHD in an appropriate clinical context and also on the timing of testing for GHD in both children and adults. A subnormal IGF-I level was considered diagnostic in both children and adults with panhypopituitarism. In children, there was consensus to recommend the arginine stimulation test and the glucagon test. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) was considered gold standard in adults and there was also consensus to recommend the macimorelin test. A stimulated GH cut-off < 5μg/l was consistent with severe GHD in children, whereas test-specific cut-offs were recommended in adults.
conclusionConsensus on the GHD diagnosis was lower in pediatric practice, mainly with respect to choice and interpretation of GH stimulation tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40335774What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.