ArticleJournal of human genetics2025
The usefulness of comprehensive genome profiling test in screening of Lynch syndrome independent of the conventional clinical screening or microsatellite instability tests.
Article in Journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A prioritization framework for BRCA1/2 variants of uncertain significance identified by comprehensive genomic profiling.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- NovelFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A novel frameshift variant inFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Thoracic aortic aneurysm combined with intracranial vascular abnormalities caused by dual mutations inFrontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome caused by germline pathogenic variants of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. To diagnose LS, the microsatellite instability (MSI) test or immunohistochemistry of MMR enzymes is used as a conventional clinical screening method for all patients with colorectal and endometrial cancers. Recently, patients with advanced-stage cancers have undergone comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP), which is useful not only for the detection of molecularly targeted personalized therapies, but also for the screening of hereditary cancer syndromes by determining presumed germline pathogenic variants (PGPVs). Between January 2020 and April 2024, 1583 patients underwent CGP at our institute. PGPVs in MMR genes were detected in 19 patients. Although one patient died prior to the disclosure of the results and eight patients declined confirmatory genetic testing, the remaining ten patients underwent confirmatory genetic tests, of whom six were found to have a hereditary origin. Two additional patients were diagnosed with LS using tumor-normal paired CGP. Eventually, a total of eight patients were diagnosed with LS. Herein, we describe two patients with microsatellite-stable cancer who could not be diagnosed using conventional clinical screening or MSI testing. Furthermore, we showed that pathogenic variants of MMR genes do not always correlate with high MSI prediction scores in several cancer types in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset analysis. These findings highlight the usefulness of CGP as a screening tool to identify individuals with possible LS, especially when conventional criteria and MSI/MMR testing fail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.