Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40335665›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Enhancing high pressure pulsation test bench performance: a machine learning approach to failure condition tracking.

Aslı Aksoy, Ömer Haki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aslı AksoyEngineering Faculty, Industrial Engineering Department, Bursa Uludag University, Gorukle Kampus, 16059, Bursa, Turkey. asliaksoy@uludag.edu.tr.
Ömer HakiBosch San. Ve Tic. A.S., Organize San. Bol. Yesil Cd. No:27, 16140, Bursa, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high-pressure pulsation test (HPPT) bench is used to test the functionality and resilience of components under high pressure and pulsation. In highly automated machining systems, it is vital to reduce the number of unplanned machine downtimes due to equipment failure, as these can lead to significant losses in resources. The objective of this study is to enhance the efficiency of HPPT benches by addressing specimen, bench, and test environment- based problems and to develop a failure condition tracking tool (FCTT) by using machine learning (ML) algorithms. The findings of this study provide a basis for the development of the company's data-driven smart predictive maintenance applications while providing an increase in the operational efficiency of HPPT benches. The data set used in the study was obtained from the HPPT benches of an automotive parts manufacturing company. Decision tree (DT), gradient boosting tree (GBT), Naïve Bayes (NB), and random forest (RF) algorithms are used to determine the best model. The comparative analysis of ML algorithms revealed that the GBT algorithm exhibits superior predictive capabilities regarding HPPT bench failure predictions. The FCTT is developed using the results of the GBT algorithm and integrated into the company's HPPT bench maintenance system. The results of this study are described as a fundamental step in the company's smart maintenance programme. Implementing FCTT has resulted in a 20% increase in HPPT utilization, a reduction in maintenance costs, and a positive contribution to the company's overall competitiveness and profitability. The utilization of FCTT has enabled the prediction of HPPT failures, the optimization of maintenance schedules, the minimization of downtime, and the improvement of maintenance practices. Furthermore, using ML technologies provides valuable insights into the performance and maintenance trends of the HPPT bench, enabling data-driven decision-making and strategic planning for the company's HPPT bench maintenance operations.

Indexed as

Big dataMachine learningPredictive maintenanceSmart maintenanceTest systems

Identifiers

PMID40335665
PMCPMC12059060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.