ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025
Autistic perspectives on the moral and ethical considerations of genetic testing for autism.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Survey-Based Study Investigating Opinions on Genetic Research Among Swedish Autistic Individuals and Parents of Autistic Children.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2026Article
- Qualitative research reporting in genetic counseling: A state-of-the-art assessment and recommendations for enhancing methodological congruence and quality.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Review
- Does genetic testing impact stigma in autism: A scoping review.Journal of community genetics · 2026Review
- Uncertainty, ethics, and progress in genomic medicine.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to characterize the nuanced perspectives expressed by Autistic adults about genetic testing for autism. In this secondary analysis of an existing dataset, we used inductive content analysis of free-text responses that Autistic adults wrote in response to questions asking about perceptions of genetic testing for autism that had been included in a previous survey. Participants who completed the survey had been recruited online. Three-hundred eighty-nine participants wrote a total of 28,774 words in response to the questions of interest. While some respondents wrote about potential benefits of genetic testing (79/389), more (333/389) wrote about potential negative outcomes of genetic testing. Participants wrote about concerns of eugenics (281/389), described a lack of trust in how genetics information would be used (125/389), and raised concerns that genetic testing could increase discrimination (66/389). This is the largest study to date to conduct an in-depth analysis of Autistic adults' opinions on genetic testing for autism. Most respondents raised serious concerns. Additional work is needed to collect more Autistic opinions about genetic testing for autism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.