ArticleExperimental & molecular medicine2025
Quantitative dynamics of neural uncertainty in sensory processing and decision-making during discriminative learning.
Article in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Frontal Theta Oscillations in Perceptual Decision-Making Reflect Cognitive Control and Confidence.Brain sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Uncertainty is crucial in sensory processing, necessitating further quantitative research on its neural representation in the sensory cortex. Here, to address this need, we used a deep learning approach to quantify uncertainties in neural activity from the forelimb area of the primary somatosensory cortex (fS1) during a vibration frequency discrimination task, introducing a transformer model designed to decode neural data not consistently tracked over time. Our model shows that the neural representation of fS1 encodes uncertainties not only from vibratory stimuli but also from decision-making processes, emphasizing its crucial role across various biological contexts. We confirmed that uncertainty decreases as learning progresses and increases with interruptions in learning. In line with predictions from previous studies, we also observed that uncertainty is high at psychometric thresholds. Furthermore, high uncertainty correlates with incorrect decisions, and we have identified dynamics in uncertainty between previous and current trials. Such findings underscore the evolving role of fS1 in assessing uncertainty for the brain's downstream areas as learning progresses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.