ArticleScientific reports2025
Prognostic analysis of nimotuzumab combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a multicenter real-world study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nimotuzumab is a monoclonal antibody against EGFR. The therapeutic efficacy of nimotuzumab in cervical cancer treatment remains inconclusive, with current evidence insufficient to establish a definitive clinical benefit. Therefore, this study compares the efficacy and safety of nimotuzumab combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and CCRT in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Information on patients with stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer who received CCRT combined with nimotuzumab or CCRT alone at five cancer centers from January 2021 to December 2022 were collected. Propensity score (PS) matching analysis was used to compare nimotuzumab group and no-nimotuzumab group. Clinical outcomes were analyzed. There were 195 patients enrolled. The 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 92.5% and 89.5%, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was 90.8%. There were 60 patients in the nimotuzumab group and 135 patients in the no-nimotuzumab group. The nimotuzumab group had a better CR rate (51.7% vs. 26.7%, P = 0.001) and ORR (98.3% vs. 87.4%, p = 0.015) compared to the no-nimotuzumab group. After PS matching, there were 54 patients in each group. There were no significant differences in 2-year OS rate and PFS rate between the two groups before and after matching. However, the nimotuzumab group had also a better CR rate and ORR compared to the no-nimotuzumab group after matching. The incidence of grade 3-4 anemia was relatively higher in nimotuzumab group than in no-nimotuzumab group after matching, while no difference was observed in other adverse events between the two groups. The combination of nimotuzumab and CCRT for LACC improved CR rate and ORR, without increasing side effects, which might become a potential treatment strategy for LACC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.