Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40335591›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Preliminary exploration of finite element biomechanical preoperative planning for complex tibial plateau fractures.

Zhi Xu, Yuwan Li, Shoujin Tian, Xing Xu, Hao Zhou, Min Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biomechanical Stability of Tibia Plateau Fracture Treatment: Conventional vs. Finite Element-Based Preoperative Planning.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhi XuDepartment of Orthopedic, Zhangjiagang Fifth People's Hospital, No.120 Lefeng Road, Zhangjiagang, 215600, Jiangsu, China.
Yuwan LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang, China.
Shoujin TianDepartment of Orthopedic, Zhangjiagang First People's Hospital, Zhangjiagang, 215600, Jiangsu, China.
Xing XuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhijin People's Hospital, Zhijin, 552100, Guizhou, China.
Hao ZhouDepartment of Orthopedic, Zhangjiagang Fifth People's Hospital, No.120 Lefeng Road, Zhangjiagang, 215600, Jiangsu, China. 1010968798@qq.com.
Min YangDepartment of Orthopedic, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, No.2 ZheShan West Road, Wuhu, 241001, Anhui, China. pkuyang@hotmail.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82302853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes, biomechanical performance, and cost-effectiveness of finite element planning (FEP) with those of traditional (Trad) methods in the treatment of complex tibial plateau fractures in middle-aged and elderly patients to ultimately optimize treatment protocols, improve surgical efficiency, and reduce the economic burden on patients. Sixteen patients with complex tibial plateau fractures were randomly divided into FEP and Trad groups, with eight patients in each group. The FEP group underwent preoperative finite element analysis for personalized surgical planning and dual-plate fixation; the Trad group participated in traditional preoperative discussions and underwent a multi-plate fixation. Perioperative and postoperative indicators were collected from both groups, and the stress distribution and displacement under different internal fixation modes were evaluated using finite element analysis. Additionally, a cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to compare the total costs of internal fixation and hospitalization. The surgical times were significantly shorter in the FEP group than in the Trad group (170.00 ± 59.52 vs. 240.00 ± 59.04 min, p = 0.033), and patients in the Trad group had shorter times to ambulation (12.88 ± 0.99 vs. 14.25 ± 1.49 days, p = 0.047). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of postoperative orthopaedic scores, mobility indices, fracture healing times, or radiological indicators. Biomechanical analysis revealed that the multiplate fixation mode provided a more uniform stress distribution, but this difference was not statistically significant. In the FEP group, the total costs of internal fixation (4772.25 ± 217.31 vs. 8991.88 ± 2811.25 yuan, p = 0.004) and hospitalization (34796.75 ± 9749.19 vs. 65405.14 ± 28684.80 yuan, p = 0.013) were significantly lower. While ensuring clinical effectiveness, FEP demonstrated greater cost-effectiveness by shortening the surgery time and reducing internal fixation costs. Although the multiplate fixation mode was biomechanically superior to the dual-plate mode, it did not result in significant clinical advantages and was more costly. FEP improves the economic efficiency of treatment for complex tibial plateau fractures in middle-aged and elderly patients and is recommended. This study has certain limitations, such as a small sample size and a short follow-up period. Thus, larger-scale studies with longer-term follow-up data are needed to further validate these findings and explore whether all patient populations can benefit from these practices or if the benefits are limited to specific groups, such as elderly patients or those with certain types of fractures.

Indexed as

Finite Element AnalysisFracture Fixation, InternalTibial FracturesAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaBone PlatesCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTibial Plateau FracturesTreatment OutcomeClinical efficacyComplex tibial plateau fracturesCost-effectivenessFinite element analysisPlanning of finite elements

Identifiers

PMID40335591
PMCPMC12058969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.