ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of quality of life and outcomes of vestibular schwannoma patients after resection and radiosurgery in an interdisciplinary treatment concept.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quality of life (QoL) is a crucial factor which has to be taken into account in the treatment of vestibular schwannomas. This study compared microsurgical and radiosurgical treatments, focusing on three. (1) evaluating post-treatment clinical outcomes, (2) assessing the effect on QoL and (3) analyzing complication rates, particularly in geriatric patients. In this retrospective study, 586 patients underwent either microsurgery or gamma knife radiosurgery between 1990 and 2013. Demographic and treatment data were collected, including quality of life (QoL) assessments using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and evaluations of the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). Complication rates were also analyzed. The study included 194 microsurgery patients and 392 radiosurgery patients. Radiosurgery patients showed significantly better postoperative hearing and facial nerve function (p < 0.05). QoL scores were higher in the radiosurgery group for physical and emotional role functioning, while microsurgery patients (including aged 65 years and older) reported better scores for bodily pain and general health perceptions. Neurological complications were 41.9% in the microsurgery group, most of them being permanent (92.9%). Radiosurgery generally showed better preservation of hearing, facial nerve function, and quality of life compared to microsurgery, although both treatments appeared equally effective in older patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.