ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhancing efficient deep learning models with multimodal, multi-teacher insights for medical image segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning for Radiomics in Oncology: Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Adaptive Knowledge Distillation for Anatomical Segmentation in Pelvic CT Imaging of Prostate Cancer.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Digital twins for personalized treatment in uro-oncology in the era of artificial intelligence.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Multimodal artificial intelligence in medicine: a task-oriented framework for clinical translation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid evolution of deep learning has dramatically enhanced the field of medical image segmentation, leading to the development of models with unprecedented accuracy in analyzing complex medical images. Deep learning-based segmentation holds significant promise for advancing clinical care and enhancing the precision of medical interventions. However, these models' high computational demand and complexity present significant barriers to their application in resource-constrained clinical settings. To address this challenge, we introduce Teach-Former, a novel knowledge distillation (KD) framework that leverages a Transformer backbone to effectively condense the knowledge of multiple teacher models into a single, streamlined student model. Moreover, it excels in the contextual and spatial interpretation of relationships across multimodal images for more accurate and precise segmentation. Teach-Former stands out by harnessing multimodal inputs (CT, PET, MRI) and distilling the final predictions and the intermediate attention maps, ensuring a richer spatial and contextual knowledge transfer. Through this technique, the student model inherits the capacity for fine segmentation while operating with a significantly reduced parameter set and computational footprint. Additionally, introducing a novel training strategy optimizes knowledge transfer, ensuring the student model captures the intricate mapping of features essential for high-fidelity segmentation. The efficacy of Teach-Former has been effectively tested on two extensive multimodal datasets, HECKTOR21 and PI-CAI22, encompassing various image types. The results demonstrate that our KD strategy reduces the model complexity and surpasses existing state-of-the-art methods to achieve superior performance. The findings of this study indicate that the proposed methodology could facilitate efficient segmentation of complex multimodal medical images, supporting clinicians in achieving more precise diagnoses and comprehensive monitoring of pathological conditions ( https://github.com/FarihaHossain/TeachFormer ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.