ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative study of the anti-tumour effects of the imipridone, ONC201 and its fluorinated analogues on pancreatic cancer cell line.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- ONC201/dordaviprone for H3 K27M-mutant tumors: Discovery, mechanisms, therapeutic potential, and future directions.Genes & diseases · 2027Review
- Stress-Induced Switch in Small Extracellular Vesicle Secretion: From Constitutive 'Torn Bag Mechanism' to Exocytosis.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2026Article
- Integrated Phenotypic and Transcriptomic Profiling Positions ONC212 as a Lead Imipridone in Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Recent advances in the design of small molecules targeting human ClpP.Future medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Combination of the First-in-Class Imipridone ONC201 and Standard Anticancer Therapies as a Rational Approach for Therapeutic Benefit.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has a high mortality rate, with a 5-year survival rate of ~ 12%. Therefore, developing new targeted therapies is urgently needed. ONC-201, a promising candidate, is currently undergoing clinical trials. The main objective of the present work is to investigate the anti-tumour activity of ONC-201 and its two fluorinated analogues (TBP-134, TBP-135). The viability of two pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines (PANC-1, MIA PaCa-2) and three other tumour cell lines (A2058, EBC-1, COLO-205) was assessed after 72-hour treatment with drugs at 0.5, 10, and 25 µM. Significant antiproliferative effects were observed, with 0.5 µM TBP-134 achieving the highest potency, reducing cell viability to approximately 50%. None of the molecules exhibited significant cytotoxicity toward normal human dermal fibroblast cells or cardiomyocytes, indicating a selective anti-tumour profile. The analogues showed more effective results than ONC201 on PANC-1 cells (IC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.