ArticleScientific reports2025
Water beetle networks differences and migration between natural lakes and post-exploitation water bodies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Indices of trophic and competitive relationships in a planktonic meta-network of carp ponds.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water deficits are a serious problem around the world, which also affects young landscapes, where lakes are most abundant. This poses a threat to many habitats and biological diversity found here. The relationships between species in the ecological networks of lakes at different stages of development and in nearby post-exploitation water bodies remain poorly understood. To better understand the functioning of beetle communities in different ecosystems, we created five network models that we subjected to graph analysis. By analysing the general attributes of the network (number of neighbours, shortest path, characteristic path length, clustering coefficient, network centralisation, network density and network heterogeneity) and those related to the nodes (NCC-Node Closeness Centrality, NBC-Node Betweenness Centrality, NDC-Node Degree Centrality) and to the edges (EBC-Edge Betweenness Centrality and correlations between the biomass of species as nodes), we were able to determine the role of each species in the networks and the relationships between the species. We then used the machine learning ensemble modelling XGBoost-SHAP to identify species that are particularly important in migrations between water bodies and to assess the direction and strength of migrations using Shapley values. Our analyses are based on faunal material from 25 lakes (mesotrophic, eutrophic, dystrophic) and 31-post-exploitation water bodies (clay pits and gravel pits) in northern Poland, in the Masurian Lake District. We found a total of 169 species representing different ecological and functional components. We have shown that the structures of the network between the biomass of species in the analysed five water types differ significantly. The highest value for network density was recorded in eutrophic lakes and clay ponds, the lowest in dystrophic lakes. In eutrophic lakes these are mainly eurybionts, in clay pits-rheophiles and in gravel pits-argilophiles and tyrphophiles. The relationship between the species with the highest NBC and EBC values is particularly important in order to maintain the stability of the network. The periphery of the network usually consists of larger predators that do not compete with each other. By analysing the migration directions of beetles between different ecosystems, we were able to demonstrate a greater affinity of the beetle fauna, especially the argilophiles (e.g. Scarodytes halensis and Laccobius minutus) inhabiting gravel pits, to dystrophic lakes. The beetles in clay pits originate mainly from mesotrophic lakes. These are mainly rheophiles, mostly weakly flying species, such as: Haliplus fluviatilis, Haliplus fulvus, Ilybius fenestratus, Hygrotus vericolor and Haliplus flavicollis. These species are important for the stability of ecological networks in the studied lake types. Their movements between the ecosystems studied in turn contribute to the functional connectivity between the individual lakes, which ensures the stabilisation of biotic relationships at the landscape level. At the same time, they generally also indicate the optimisation of environmental conditions in post-exploitation water bodies, which makes them potential substitute habitats for natural lakes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.