ArticleScientific reports2025
Validity of Hera Leto consumer earbuds for heart rate monitoring during stationary cycling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Representation of Different Populations in Studies Assessing the Validity of Consumer Wearable Photoplethysmography-Based Measurements: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Accuracy of heart rate measurement using AirPods Pro 3 during graded treadmill exercise: A laboratory-based validation study.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Energy-Expenditure Estimation During Aerobic Training Sessions for Badminton Players.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heart rate (HR) monitoring using earbuds presents a promising avenue for precise measurement, yet its validity remains under investigation during stationary cycling. In this study, we assessed the validity of the Hera Leto consumer earbuds by enrolling twenty-eight athletes as participants. Each participant wore a chest-strap Polar H10, considered the gold-standard reference, while simultaneously testing three HR monitors: the Hera Leto (worn on the ears), the Polar Verity Sense (worn on the upper arm), and the Polar Vantage V (worn on the wrist). The exercise protocol included four steady-state exercise sessions, six sessions of severe intensity exhaustive exercise, and three high-intensity interval training (HIIT) sessions. Our findings revealed a robust correlation ([Formula: see text]=0.970, [Formula: see text]<0.001) between the HR measurements obtained from Hera Leto and Polar H10 across all exercise intensities, with a minimal systematic bias of - 0.67 bpm. with a minimal systematic bias of -0.67 bpm. Notably, Hera Leto demonstrated superior performance, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2 bpm and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of 0.97, compared to the Polar Verity Sense (MAE = 4 bpm, CCC = 0.88) and Polar Vantage V (MAE = 4 bpm, CCC = 0.93). Although the precision of HR measurement decreased with increasing exercise intensity, Hera Leto exhibited a slower onset of this decline compared to the other devices. Overall, our study underscores the potential of Hera Leto earbuds as a valid tool for HR monitoring, particularly in scenarios involving steady-state exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.