Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40335502›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2025

Neural mechanisms balancing accuracy and flexibility in working memory and decision tasks.

Han Yan, Jin Wang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Han YanCenter for Theoretical Interdisciplinary Sciences, Wenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325001, China.
Jin WangDepartment of Chemistry and Physics, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, 11790, USA. jin.wang.1@stonybrook.edu.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 12205306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The living system follows the principles of physics, yet distinctive features, such as adaptability, differentiate it from conventional systems. The cognitive functions of decision-making (DM) and working memory (WM) are crucial for animal adaptation, but the underlying mechanisms are still unclear. To explore the mechanism underlying DM and WM functions, here we applied a general non-equilibrium landscape and flux approach to a biophysically based model that can perform decision-making and working memory functions. Our findings reveal that DM accuracy improved with stronger resting states in the circuit architecture with selective inhibition. However, the robustness of working memory against distractors was weakened. To address this, an additional non-selective input during the delay period of decision-making tasks was proposed as a mechanism to gate distractors with minimal increase in thermodynamic cost. This temporal gating mechanism, combined with the selective-inhibition circuit architecture, supports a dynamical modulation that emphasizes the robustness or flexibility to incoming stimuli in working memory tasks according to the cognitive task demands. Our approach offers a quantitative framework to uncover mechanisms underlying cognitive functions grounded in non-equilibrium physics.

Indexed as

Decision MakingMemory, Short-TermAnimalsCognitionHumansModels, Neurological

Identifiers

PMID40335502
PMCPMC12059158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.