Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40335454›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Tinnitus risk factors and its evolution over time.

Lise Hobeika, Matt Fillingim, Christophe Tanguay-Sabourin, Mathieu Roy, Alain Londero, Séverine Samson, Etienne Vachon-Presseau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Tinnitus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. [Research progress on the mechanism of auditory center remodeling and clinical intervention strategies in presbycusis].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lise HobeikaUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Pasteur, AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Fondation Pour l'Audition, Institut de l'Audition, IHU reConnect, Paris, France. lise.hobeika@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1257-7187
Matt FillingimAlan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Christophe Tanguay-SabourinAlan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0426-8322
Mathieu RoyAlan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Alain LonderoUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Pasteur, AP-HP, Hôpital Lariboisière, Service ORL, INSERM, Fondation Pour l'Audition, IHU reConnect, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3876-0657
Séverine SamsonUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Pasteur, AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Fondation Pour l'Audition, Institut de l'Audition, IHU reConnect, Paris, France.
Etienne Vachon-PresseauAlan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8681-3154

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-23-IAHU-0003European Commission (EC) 101146406Gouvernement du Canada | Instituts de Recherche en Santé du Canada | CIHR Skin Research Training Centre (Skin Research Training Centre) 453096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subjective tinnitus is an auditory percept unrelated to external sounds, for which the limited understanding of its risk factors complicates the prevention and management. In this study, we train two distinct machine learning models to predict tinnitus presence (how often individuals perceive tinnitus) and severity separately using socio-demographic, psychological, and health-related predictors with the UK Biobank dataset (192,993 participants, 41,042 with tinnitus). We show that hearing health was the primary risk factor of both presence and severity, while mood, neuroticism, and sleep predicted severity. The severity model accurately predicts tinnitus progression over nine years, with a large effect size for individuals developing severe tinnitus (Cohen's d = 1.3, ROC = 0.78). This result is validated on 463 individuals from the Tinnitus Research Initiative database. We simplify the severity model to a six-item clinical questionnaire that detects individuals at risk of severe tinnitus, for which early supportive care would be crucial.

Indexed as

TinnitusAdultAgedDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedNeuroticismRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID40335454
PMCPMC12059016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.