ArticleAnnals of Indian Academy of Neurology2025
Optimal Systolic Blood Pressure Control After Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Article in Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe optimal systolic blood pressure (SBP) control after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is unclear. This study aimed to determine whether intensive SBP control (<140 mmHg) within 24 h post-EVT, compared to conventional management (<180 mmHg), leads to a better functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days.
methodsFollowing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched databases (PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Web of Science) for English language articles up to March 15, 2024. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing intensive versus conventional SBP control up to 24 h post-EVT. Studies without separate primary outcome data and case series/reports were excluded. The primary outcome was functional independence (mRS 0-2 at 90 days).
resultsTwelve studies (n = 5152 patients; five RCTs and seven observational studies) were included, and a primary analysis of the RCTs, along with a secondary exploratory analysis of the observational studies were conducted. The analysis of RCTs favored conventional control for the primary outcome (risk ratio [RR]- 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]- 0.73-0.90; P < 0.0001). Mortality rates (RR- 1.14, 95% CI- 0.89-1.45; P = 0.29) and the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR- 1.10, 95% CI- 0.77-1.58; P = 0.60) were similar in both groups. The secondary exploratory analysis of observational data favored the intensive arm for the primary outcome (RR- 1.28, 95% CI- 1.17-1.41; P < 0.00001).
conclusionsOur primary analysis of RCTs showed that intensive control was associated with poorer functional outcomes, with no significant impact on mortality rate or the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Although observational studies suggested better outcomes with intensive control, we recommend conventional management based on Level 1 evidence from RCTs.PROSPERO Registration no - CRD42023463173.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.