ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025
Mechanisms of Tone-in-Noise Encoding in the Inferior Colliculus.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Formant-frequency encoding in the inferior colliculus of awake rabbit: Physiological and model responses.Hearing research · 2026Article
- Noise-invariant representations of sound emerge along the canonical cortical hierarchy.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Timbre Encoding in the Inferior Colliculus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracellular single-unit responses to tone-in-noise (TIN) stimuli were recorded in the inferior colliculus (IC) of awake female Dutch-belted rabbits. Stimuli consisted of wideband and narrowband TIN with on-and-off characteristic frequency tones. Neural responses to wideband TIN showed a pattern of rates that increased when the tone matched CF and decreased (with respect to noise-alone responses) when the tone was above or below CF. This result differed from narrowband TIN IC responses that depended on envelope fluctuations in the stimulus, consistent with neural-fluctuation sensitivity. The wideband TIN responses could be fit with a difference-of-Gaussians model that had narrow excitation and broad inhibition; responses to TIN could not be predicted by response maps or spectrotemporal receptive fields. Responses to diotic and contralateral presentations of wideband TIN did not differ due to presentation ear. A single-CF computational model of the IC could not predict responses to wideband TIN. However, adding local off-CF inhibitory inputs to an on-CF IC model improved accuracy. These results suggest that broad inhibition could explain encoding of wideband TIN at suprathreshold signal-to-noise ratios, whereas neural fluctuation sensitivity is more important for narrowband sounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.