ArticleBMJ open2025
Lived experiences of patients using positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy: a nested phenomenological study within the 3DPiPPIn randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSleep disordered breathing is a chronic condition often requiring patient commitment to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. Understanding the lived experience of PAP therapy users is crucial for clinicians to support successful treatment and identify research priorities. There is a lack of evidence in this area, and published data predominantly explore the negative experiences of PAP. This study aims to explore the lived experiences of patients using PAP therapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study employs a phenomenological approach, appropriate for researching human experiences where there is little existing research. Heideggerian theory underpins the research, recognising that the researcher's beliefs influence meaning, allowing for rich analysis of the lived experience.Participants will be recruited from a randomised controlled trial investigating the medium-term clinical impact of customised interfaces for patients requiring PAP therapy. Purposive sampling will be used to seek representation from various demographics, with a maximum of 30 participants.Data collection will be via 1:1 semistructured interviews. Data will be analysed using Braun and Clarke's six-phase reflexive thematic analysis. Data will be analysed inductively through an interpretivism lens. Data will be managed with computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved by the Hampshire B Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 22/SC/0405). Results will be disseminated to healthcare professionals and patients through conferences, open-access journals, newsletters, the study webpage, infographics, animations, social media and healthcare awards. Tracy's eight 'big tent' criteria for excellent qualitative research are comprehensive and encompassing, and this protocol has aimed to meet the criteria. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research has also been used. The findings of this study will contribute to a more holistic understanding of the lived experience of PAP therapy users, informing clinical practice and future research. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN74082423.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.