Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40335132›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Impact of early haemodynamic assessment by echocardiography on organ dysfunction and outcome of patients admitted to the emergency department with sepsis or septic shock: protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (GENESIS).

Thomas Lafon, Amélie Le Gouge, Samia Brit, Bruno Giraudeau, Philippe Vignon

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04580888 (Impact of Early Haemodynamic Assessment by Echocardiography on Organ Dysfunction of Patients Admitted in the Emergency Department for Sepsis or Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04580888 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of Early Haemodynamic Assessment by Echocardiography on Organ Dysfunction of Patients Admitted in the Emergency Department for Sepsis or Septic Shock

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, LimogesRan2021 to 2025Enrolled312ConditionsSepsis, Echocardiography, Organ Dysfunction Syndrome Sepsis, EmergenciesArmsearly transthoracic echocardiography, standards of care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas LafonService d'Accueil des Urgences, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France thomas.lafon@chu-limoges.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4424-8107
Amélie Le GougeINSERM CIC 1415, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France.
Samia BritINSERM CIC 1415, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France.
Bruno GiraudeauINSERM CIC 1415, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France.
Philippe VignonInserm CIC 1435, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4551-5772

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute circulatory failure plays a major role in the development of sepsis-related organ dysfunction. Current 'bundles' of the METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a two-parallel arm randomised trial with blinded assessment comparing early haemodynamic assessment using transthoracic echocardiography aimed at guiding therapeutic management to standard of care according to current SSC recommendations in septic patients during initial management in 13 French EDs. Patients with suspected or documented infection and a qualifying quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score (haemodynamic criterion required: systolic blood pressure≤100 mm Hg) will be 1:1 randomised after 500 mL of fluid loading initiation. In the intervention group, echocardiography will allow identifying the haemodynamic profile at the origin of sepsis-induced circulatory failure and monitoring the efficacy and tolerance of fluid resuscitation, or of any other therapeutic intervention according to a predefined therapeutic algorithm. The control group will receive conventional 30 mL/kg fluid resuscitation (unless pulmonary venous congestion) according to SSC recommendations. Primary outcome will be the course of organ dysfunction assessed by the crude change in the modified SOFA score between baseline and 24 hours after randomisation. Secondary outcomes will be the nature of therapeutic interventions resulting from echocardiography (fluid loading, early initiation of vasopressor support or inotrope), the prevalence of the different haemodynamic profiles, the evolution of lactatemia, the safety of the initial therapeutic, the proportion of patients who develop secondarily septic shock, the orientation of patients after ED discharge and both day 7 and in-hospital mortality. We plan to randomise 312 patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approved by the Ethics Committee TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04580888.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyHemodynamicsMultiple Organ FailureSepsisShock, SepticEmergency Service, HospitalFluid TherapyFranceHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicOrgan Dysfunction ScoresRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicEchocardiographyEmergency DepartmentsINFECTIOUS DISEASESPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID40335132
PMCPMC12056654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.