ArticleSaudi medical journal2025
Identifying individuals at risk of post-stroke depression: Development and validation of a predictive model.
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors associated with post-stroke depression one month after discharge among older patients based on Health Ecology Theory: a retrospective cross-sectional study of consecutive cases.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Prevalence and factors associated with post-stroke depression: a cross-sectional analysis of a prospectively assembled cohort in Eastern Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Early functional recovery and clinical risk profiles predict distinct trajectories of post-stroke depression: a one-year longitudinal analysis.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Cognitive Impairment and Psychological Morbidity Among Stroke Survivors in Rehabilitation: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo identify the factors associated with post-stroke depression (PSD) and develop a machine learning predictive model using a large dataset, considering sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical factors.
methodsOur 2025 study used data from the 2023 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, released in September 2024. Data processing was carried out using Google Colab and Python. We carried out descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and feature importance analyses (mutual information and adjusted mutual information). A total of 4 machine-learning models were trained and evaluated: random forest, decision tree, gradient boosting, and logistic regression. Model performance was assessed using the accuracy, precision, recall, harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score), and area under the curve - receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC). The best-performing model was fine-tuned using GridSearchCV with 5-fold cross-validation.
resultsIncreasing age, male gender, being married, higher income, and physical activity were associated with lower odds of PSD. Obesity, smoking, diabetes, and high cholesterol are associated with increased odds of PSD. Age and gender were the most informative features for predicting the PSD. Random forest demonstrated the best performance for predicting PSD (accuracy=0.73, precision=0.71, recall=0.77, F1-score=0.74, and AUC-ROC=0.81), which was further improved by hyperparameter optimization.
conclusionPost-stroke depression's complex etiology involves sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical factors, notably age and gender. A random forest model effectively predicts PSD, highlighting the need for comprehensive assessment, early intervention, and management of modifiable risks (obesity, smoking, and inactivity) to improve stroke survivors' outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.