Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40335097›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2025

Complex mental health difficulties in primary care: a scoping review with thematic synthesis.

Kritica Dwivedi, Vyv Huddy, Phillip Oliver, Chris Burton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Complex mental health difficulties: a mixed-methods study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kritica DwivediDivision of Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0915-7250
Vyv HuddyClinical Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0567-8166
Phillip OliverDivision of Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9665-0635
Chris BurtonDivision of Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom chris.burton@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0233-2431

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplex mental health difficulties (CMHD) is an umbrella term for long-term problems with emotions and relationships, including personality disorders (PD), persistent depression, and consequences of trauma. People with CMHD often fall between NHS services that focus on either common mental disorders (anxiety, depression) or psychosis, leaving GPs as their main source of support.

aimTo understand what is known about primary care for CMHD, from both GP and patient perspectives. DESIGN &

settingWe conducted a scoping review of GP and patient experiences of CMHD in primary care in UK, Europe, Australasia, and North America.

methodWe searched MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and Embase for eligible studies between January 2002 and October 2023. Titles and full texts were screened by two reviewers. Thematic synthesis of qualitative studies and narrative synthesis of quantitative studies were undertaken.

resultsWe screened 2209 papers and 33 met inclusion criteria. The following three key themes were found: the challenge of recognising CMHD; the work of caring for people with CMHD; and patient priorities. GPs recognised CMHD through complexity of diagnoses, of psychosocial issues, and of healthcare use. However, they were ambivalent about diagnosis and lacked the resources to make or discuss diagnoses. Working with people with CMHD involved responsibility work, relationship work, and emotional work, under pressured conditions. Patient priorities included addressing stigma, reducing fragmentation, and receiving relationship-focused care.

conclusionThis scoping review delineates the very real challenges people with CMHD and their GPs face in providing care. It helps set an agenda for work to address gaps in provision and improve outcomes.

Indexed as

family medicinegeneral practicemental healthsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40335097
PMCPMC12820501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.