ArticlePreventive medicine2025
Are recent decreases in adult obesity trends in the United States encouraging or alarming?
Article in Preventive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Temporal Trends of the Obesity Epidemic in the United States.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
From 2022 to 2023, there was a slight decrease in the prevalence of obesity among adults in the United States. While the reduced prevalence of obesity may be accompanied with certain public health benefits, including in the South that has a longstanding history of preventable morbidity and mortality driven by adverse social determinants of health, these trends have coincided with the increased use of body mass index (BMI) in medical assessments as well as the rapid ascension of weight loss interventions and medications focused on short-term weight loss. This commentary summarizes the rationale for interpreting these trends with caution, including three recommendations for research and practice. The first recommendation focuses on shifting from body composition to cardiometabolic health, including transitioning from BMI to more robust diagnostic systems that incorporate a variety of cardiovascular, metabolic, anthropometric, and genetic factors into medical assessments and risk classification (e.g., cardiometabolic index). The second recommendation reconsiders weight loss as a clinical outcome by emphasizing gradual lifestyle changes over rapid transformations through personalized and systems interventions. The third recommendation focuses on increasing pharmacovigilance of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist drugs for estimates of misuse and adverse outcomes, especially among high-risk patient populations like eating disorders. The commentary concludes with a synopsis of strategies for each recommendation with the ultimate goal of preventing population-level harms and unintended consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.