ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2025
Differential Impact of Central and Global Visual Field Progression on Quality of Life in Glaucoma.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Proportion of Fast Progressors in the Central versus Global Visual Field Across Varying Glaucoma Severity Groups.American journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine the impact of progression of central visual field (VF) and global VF on vision-related quality of life (VRQOL).
designRetrospective cohort study.
methodsThis study included 364 eyes of 235 primary open-angle glaucoma participants who had at least five 24-2 VF tests over a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The slopes of global mean deviation (MD) and central mean total deviation (MTD
resultsThe baseline 24-2 VF MD of all participants was -5.6 (95% CI -6.4, -4.9) decibels (dB). At baseline, eyes with MTD
conclusionsCentral VF change had a greater impact on VRQOL compared to global VF change. Conventional assessments based on global MD may underestimate the effect of central VF changes. Refining progression detection strategies to include central VF is necessary to better reflect changes in patient-centered outcomes like VRQOL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.