Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40334702›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Explainable Machine Learning Models for Colorectal Cancer Prediction Using Clinical Laboratory Data.

Rui Li, Xiaoyan Hao, Yanjun Diao, Liu Yang, Jiayun Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Histopathological Classification in Colorectal Polyps.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rui LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Xiaoyan HaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Yanjun DiaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Liu YangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.ORCID 0009-0000-1859-5397
Jiayun LiuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionEarly diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant clinical challenge. This study aims to develop machine learning (ML) models for CRC risk prediction using clinical laboratory data.MethodsThis retrospective, single-center study analyzed laboratory examination data from healthy controls (HC), polyp patients (Polyp), and CRC patients between 2013 and 2023. Five ML algorithms, including adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), decision tree (DT), logistic regression (LR), and random forest (RF), were employed to classify subjects into HC vs Polyp vs CRC, HC vs CRC, and Polyp vs CRC, respectively.ResultsThis study included 31 539 subjects: 11 793 HCs, 10 125 polyp patients, and 9621 CRC patients. The XGBoost model achieved the highest AUCs of 0.966 for differentiating HC from CRC and 0.881 for Polyp from CRC, outperforming carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) and fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) tests. This model could also identify CEA-negative or FOBT-negative CRC patients. Incorporating stool miR-92a detection into the model further improved diagnostic performance. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) plots indicated that FOBT, CEA, lymphocyte percentage (LYMPH%), and hematocrit (HCT) were the most significant features contributing to CRC diagnosis. Additionally, a computational tool for predicting CRC risk based on the optimal model was developed, designed for researchers with programming experience.ConclusionFive ML models for CRC diagnosis, based on ten routine laboratory test items, were developed, achieving higher diagnostic accuracies than traditional CRC biomarkers. The diagnostic capabilities of these ML models can be further enhanced by including stool miR-92a levels.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMachine LearningAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenCase-Control StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedOccult BloodRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenMicroRNAsclinical laboratory datacolorectal cancermachine learningmiR-92arisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID40334702
PMCPMC12062600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.