ReviewInternational journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology2025
Artificial intelligence in pediatric otolaryngology: A state-of-the-art review of opportunities and pitfalls.
Review in International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Turing problems in otolaryngology: a scoping review of the principal challenges of artificial ıntelligence and large language models.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Review
- Polysomnographic versus parent-reported predictors of executive function in children with sleep disordered breathing.International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2026Article
- Current and Future Trends in Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundArtificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have transformative potential in enhancing diagnostics, treatment planning, and patient management. However, their application in pediatric otolaryngology remains limited as the unique physiological and developmental characteristics of children require tailored AI applications, highlighting a gap in knowledge. PURPOSE: To provide a narrative review of current literature on the application of AI in pediatric otolaryngology, highlighting knowledge gaps, associated challenges and future directions.
resultsML models have demonstrated efficacy in diagnosing conditions such as otitis media, adenoid hypertrophy, and pediatric obstructive sleep apnea through deep learning-based image analysis and predictive modeling. AI systems also show potential in surgical settings such as landmark identification during otologic surgery and prediction of middle ear effusion during tympanostomy tube placement. Telemedicine solutions and large language models have shown potential to improve accessibility to care and patient education. The principal challenges include flawed generalization of adult training data and the relative lack of pediatric data.
conclusionsAI holds significant promise in pediatric otolaryngology. However, its widespread clinical integration requires addressing algorithmic bias, enhancing model interpretability, and ensuring robust validation across pediatric population. Future research should prioritize federated learning, developmental trajectory modeling, and psychosocial integration to create patient-centered solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.