SynthesisInternational journal of nursing studies2025
Driving behavior and driving outcomes after acute and critical illness: A systematic review.
Synthesis in International journal of nursing studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Delirium and Self-Reported Driving Behaviors and Outcomes After Critical Illness.JAMA network open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdults recovering from hospitalization for acute or critical illnesses often face new or worsening physical and cognitive impairments, which can impact their driving abilities and safety. The purpose of this review is to synthesize evidence on driving behaviors and outcomes in the six months following hospitalization for acute or critical illness to guide patient care, provider recommendations, and future research.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases from 1997 to October 20, 2023 with forward and backward searches. Primary empirical research involving vehicle drivers was included. Studies were excluded if they involved fewer than five participants, or if they focused on acute medical conditions with established driving rehabilitation programs. Two reviewers screened abstracts and full texts, resolving discrepancies through discussion.
resultsNineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Driving behavior and safety data from these studies were derived from simulators (n = 10), self-reports (n = 8) and administrative/regulatory datasets (n = 1). Simulation studies primarily focused on post-surgical populations, and brake reaction times. Self-report studies highlighted driving suspension, cessation, and perceived safety issues. The heterogeneity of study designs and populations limited formal meta-analyses. DISCUSSION: The evidence on driving safety and behavior post-hospitalization is heterogeneous and sparse, with some studies indicating no significant change in collision rates and others showing increased risks. Consequently, clinicians face challenges in recommendations on return to driving. There is a need for robust study designs and naturalistic driving studies to examine the specific impacts of hospitalization on driving safety and to develop evidence-based guidelines to address discharge planning to answer questions of "when should I return to driving?" REGISTRATION: PROSPERO identifier CRD42023464876.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.