Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40334406›Full record

ReviewJournal of environmental management2025

Realistic and field scale applications of biochar for water remediation: A literature review.

June Fang, Dengjun Wang, Richard Wilkin, Chunming Su

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of environmental management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Posttreatment of Domestic Wastewater Using Green Coconut Biochar for Coriander Fertigation.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

June FangOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Fellow at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 919 Kerr Research Drive, Ada, OK, 74820, USA. Electronic address: Fang.June@epa.gov.
Dengjun WangDepartment of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA. Electronic address: dengjun.wang@ufl.edu.
Richard WilkinGroundwater Characterization and Remediation Division, Center for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 919 Kerr Research Drive, Ada, OK, 74820, USA. Electronic address: Wilkin.Rick@epa.gov.
Chunming SuGroundwater Characterization and Remediation Division, Center for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 919 Kerr Research Drive, Ada, OK, 74820, USA. Electronic address: Su.Chunming@epa.gov.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biochar has received increasing attention in recent years as a potentially cost-competitive adsorbent for removing various contaminants from surface water and groundwater. However, most published studies have been conducted in the laboratory on a bench scale. Laboratory conditions do not necessarily reflect the complex, heterogeneous, and dynamic field conditions of actual contaminated surface water and groundwater environments. There is a lack of comprehensive literature review regarding the performance of biochar for contaminant removal, especially under realistic field conditions and at field scale. Here, we evaluated 31 studies on realistic applications of biochar for water remediation by searching the keywords: pilot scale, field scale, and mesocosm scale combined with biochar and water remediation. Biochar was found to be incorporated into a variety of water remediation technologies for treating both inorganic and organic contaminants, such as nutrients, heavy metals, pesticides, and pharmaceuticals in polluted waters and wastewaters. Also, biochar showed the potential to be effective on a field scale or in realistic remediation technologies, although it is not always as effective as other sorbents, such as activated carbon (AC). This is partially because AC has better physicochemical characteristics such as higher surface area and more micropores. Effectiveness for contaminant removal varies according to the targeted contaminants, the type and dosage of biochar used, and the treatment technology incorporating biochar. Finally, knowledge gaps and future research areas are identified. For example, more field scale studies are needed to test the effectiveness of biochar as an adsorbent under realistic conditions to pinpoint specific characteristics suitable for target contaminants. Physicochemical characteristics of the biochar can also change over time during the treatment process due to weathering, which may negatively affect the treatment performance. The effects of scaling up production on biochar quality should therefore also be further investigated, as physicochemical characteristics can be affected by varying the synthesis conditions. Regeneration and disposal of spent biochar is another active research area to determine the overall treatment costs.

Indexed as

CharcoalEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater PurificationAdsorptionGroundwaterMetals, HeavybiocharCharcoalMetals, HeavyWater Pollutants, ChemicalCarbonaceous adsorbentsHeavy metalsLarge scale adsorptionOrganic contaminantsWater remediation

Identifiers

PMID40334406
PMCPMC12160065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.