ReviewDiagnostic microbiology and infectious disease2025
Oral fluid versus blood in HIV self-testing: A step towards "95-95-95" targets of the UNAIDS?
Review in Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- HIV testing uptake and the effect of health education on HIV self-testing among undergraduate students in public universities in Imo State, Nigeria.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Urine-based HIV-1 self-testing in China: A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy and usability study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The population of HIV-infected individuals who are not aware of their HIV status or who do not usually have access to HIV services should be reached by the newer strategies. The WHO's guideline on HIV self-testing (HIV-ST) was based on a boost in the number of tests administered in randomized clinical trials, including those carried out among the general population in regions with a high HIV burden. Therefore, HIV-ST offers tremendous potential as a strategy to enhance testing frequency and improve access to HIV testing among key high-risk populations and their partners. Recent studies have documented that HIV-ST with oral fluid is perceived as a more convenient and also preferred option than using the finger prick blood-based testing due to "fear of prick", and have also reported of user's error with finger prick blood-based tests increasing than oral fluid-based test. The major benefit of oral fluid-based HIV-ST is that it makes it easier for first-time users to access testing and is more likely to increase testing frequency among key high-risk populations. The current review summarizes the pros and cons of the HIV-ST devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.