Trial reportESMO open2025
Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in combination with chemotherapy in first-line metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: outcomes by tumor mutational burden in POSEIDON.
Trial report in ESMO open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress in perioperative immunotherapy for lung cancer and analysis of therapy (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Correlation between tumor mutational burden and CT radiographic features in EGFR exon 19 deletion-mutated lung adenocarcinoma: a diagnostic accuracy study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in HIV-associated advanced lung cancer: from mechanisms to clinical practice.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn updated analyses from the phase III POSEIDON study, after a median follow-up of >5 years, tremelimumab plus durvalumab and chemotherapy (T + D + CT) showed durable long-term overall survival (OS) benefit versus CT alone in first-line metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). In this article, we report the associations of tumor mutational burden (TMB) with outcomes of D with or without T in combination with CT versus CT alone. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 1013 patients with EGFR/ALK wild-type mNSCLC were randomized (1 : 1 : 1) to T + D + CT, D + CT, or CT, stratified by programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor cell (TC) expression ≥50% versus <50%, disease stage (IVA versus IVB) and histology (squamous versus nonsquamous). Patient subgroups were defined by a range of blood TMB (bTMB) values, including at a prespecified cut-off of 20 mutations (mut)/megabase (Mb) and across further subdivisions by PD-L1 TC expression ≥1% or <1% and by tissue TMB (tTMB) values.
resultsAt the primary OS data cut-off (12 March 2021), at each bTMB or tTMB cut-off, the magnitude of OS benefit appeared greater among patients in the bTMB- or tTMB-high subgroups for the T + D + CT arm versus the CT arm but was similar between subgroups for the D + CT arm versus the CT arm. Updated OS analyses in the bTMB ≥20 and <20 mut/Mb subgroups, after median follow-up of >5 years (data cut-off 24 August 2023), were similar to those obtained at the primary OS data cut-off.
conclusionsFirst-line treatment with T (limited course) plus D (until progression) and four cycles of CT consistently improved clinical outcomes versus CT alone in both bTMB-high and -low subgroups, and also in both high and low tTMB subgroups, in patients with mNSCLC. Benefit appeared greater in the TMB-high versus TMB-low subgroups; the addition of anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 to anti-PD-L1 and CT seemed to increase the magnitude of this difference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.