ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2025
Ultrasound-Assisted sequential processing of barley straw using binary acidic and hydrated ternary deep eutectic solvents for nanocellulose production.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overcoming Biomass Recalcitrance Heterogeneity Using a Surfactant-Based CTAB/LA/CuApplied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Review
- Bio-Based Fertilizers from Waste: Nutrient Recovery, Soil Health, and Circular Economy Impacts.Toxics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to valorise barley straw by using a binary acidic deep eutectic solvent (DES) made from choline chloride and lactic acid for biomass pretreatment, and a hydrated ternary DES (HDES) composed of betaine, oxalic acid, and water (BOW HDES) for downstream processing to produce nanocellulose. The ultrasound-assisted DES pretreatment significantly enhanced lignin and hemicellulose solubilisation, achieving an average lignin removal of 70.54 % and hemicellulose solubilisation of 69.58 % under optimal conditions. Purification of US-DES-treated solid residue resulted in a cellulose yield of 39.81 ± 1.47 % with a purity of 91.31 ± 0.93 %, comparable to or exceeding conventional fractionation methods. The yield of lignin-rich material was 9.40 ± 0.89 % with a lignin purity of 83.29 ± 1.57 %. Further, nanocellulose was produced using a sequential process comprising low-viscosity HDES treatment, which improved fibre swelling and solubilisation, followed by high-intensity ultrasound (HIUS) treatment for nanoscale defibrillation. DLS analysis of the optimal nanocellulose sample revealed that 77.8 % of nanoparticles had a diameter below 100 nm, demonstrating a high yield of nanoscale material. XRD analysis confirmed the preservation of the cellulose I crystalline structure throughout processing, ensuring structural integrity. These findings demonstrate an efficient and sustainable biorefinery approach for lignin, cellulose, and nanocellulose extraction from agricultural residues, offering potential for scalable nanocellulose production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.