ArticlePloS one2025
Performance evaluation of machine learning techniques in surface morphology and corrosion prediction for A286 3D printed micro-lattice structures.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- HMQ-ES-Stack-GBR: A Hybrid Ensemble Learning Model for Mechanical and Physical Quality Prediction in FDM 3D Printing.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Comparative Study of Machine Learning Models for Optimal Prediction of Printed-Line Features in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Topology-alloy interactions governing deformation and failure in LPBF-fabricated A286 and Inconel 718 lattice structures.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Physics-guided explainable machine learning for multi-response modeling of electrochemical micro-machining using polymer graphite electrodes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Primacy of feature engineering over architectural complexity for intermittent demand forecasting.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Global Research Trends in Biomimetic Lattice Structures for Energy Absorption and Deformation: A Bibliometric Analysis (2020-2025).Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Experimental and machine learning-driven assessment of IS 2062 steel under double-base propellant combustion conditions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- AI-driven models for prediction of ceramic tiles' properties and detection of the influences: Behavior during shaping and drying.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of lightweight, corrosion-resistant metallic lattice structures has gained significant attention in aerospace, defense, and structural applications, where material durability and weight optimization are critical. This study investigates the corrosion behavior of Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF)-fabricated A286 steel honeycomb, Body-Centered Cubic (BCC), and gyroid lattices, comparing their performance against conventional materials such as Rolled Homogeneous Armor (RHA), Maraging High Strength Steel (MHA), and High-Nitrogen Steel (HNS). Corrosion testing was conducted using accelerated salt spray exposure, and the results were validated through computed tomography (CT)-based structural integrity analysis and machine learning-based predictive modeling. The experimental findings revealed that lattice structures exhibited significantly lower corrosion rates than conventional bulk materials, with the honeycomb lattice demonstrating the highest corrosion resistance (1.218 mm/year), followed by BCC (1.311 mm/year) and gyroid (1.671 mm/year). Compared to RHA, the honeycomb lattice exhibited a 57.23% reduction in corrosion rate, confirming its superior electrochemical stability. CT scan evaluations further highlighted differences in density distribution and geometric fidelity, with honeycomb lattices showing the most uniform porosity, while BCC structures displayed localized density variations at nodal intersections. To enhance predictive capabilities, various machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed to model corrosion behavior based on weight-loss measurements and lattice topology. Bayesian Ridge regression outperformed other models, achieving an R² of 0.99849 and RMSE of 0.00049, confirming its robustness in capturing corrosion trends. Linear Regression also performed well, while ensemble models such as Random Forest and XGBoost exhibited higher error margins due to dataset linearity constraints. Residual analysis and graphical interpretations further validated the stability and predictive reliability of ML-based corrosion assessments, demonstrating their feasibility as an alternative to traditional experimental methods. This study presents a comprehensive framework for integrating experimental corrosion testing, computational modeling, and CT-based defect analysis, offering a scalable approach to optimizing micro-lattice designs for corrosion-sensitive applications. The findings highlight the potential of LPBF-fabricated metallic lattices for aerospace, defense, and marine structures, where enhanced corrosion resistance, reduced material degradation, and predictive maintenance strategies are essential for long-term operational performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.