Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40334230›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Performance evaluation of machine learning techniques in surface morphology and corrosion prediction for A286 3D printed micro-lattice structures.

Ameer Malik Shaik, Veera Siva Reddy B, Durga Prabhas S, Chandrasekhara Sastry C, J Krishnaiah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ameer Malik ShaikCombat Vehicles Research and Development Establishment (CVRDE), DRDO, Chennai, India.
Veera Siva Reddy BDepartment of Mechanical Engineering (MED), Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing (IIITDM) Kurnoolhra Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9169-6630
Durga Prabhas SDepartment of Mechanical Engineering (MED), Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing (IIITDM) Kurnoolhra Pradesh, India.
Chandrasekhara Sastry CDepartment of Mechanical Engineering (MED), Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing (IIITDM) Kurnoolhra Pradesh, India.
J KrishnaiahDepartment of Mechanical Engineering (MED), Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing (IIITDM) Kurnoolhra Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of lightweight, corrosion-resistant metallic lattice structures has gained significant attention in aerospace, defense, and structural applications, where material durability and weight optimization are critical. This study investigates the corrosion behavior of Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF)-fabricated A286 steel honeycomb, Body-Centered Cubic (BCC), and gyroid lattices, comparing their performance against conventional materials such as Rolled Homogeneous Armor (RHA), Maraging High Strength Steel (MHA), and High-Nitrogen Steel (HNS). Corrosion testing was conducted using accelerated salt spray exposure, and the results were validated through computed tomography (CT)-based structural integrity analysis and machine learning-based predictive modeling. The experimental findings revealed that lattice structures exhibited significantly lower corrosion rates than conventional bulk materials, with the honeycomb lattice demonstrating the highest corrosion resistance (1.218 mm/year), followed by BCC (1.311 mm/year) and gyroid (1.671 mm/year). Compared to RHA, the honeycomb lattice exhibited a 57.23% reduction in corrosion rate, confirming its superior electrochemical stability. CT scan evaluations further highlighted differences in density distribution and geometric fidelity, with honeycomb lattices showing the most uniform porosity, while BCC structures displayed localized density variations at nodal intersections. To enhance predictive capabilities, various machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed to model corrosion behavior based on weight-loss measurements and lattice topology. Bayesian Ridge regression outperformed other models, achieving an R² of 0.99849 and RMSE of 0.00049, confirming its robustness in capturing corrosion trends. Linear Regression also performed well, while ensemble models such as Random Forest and XGBoost exhibited higher error margins due to dataset linearity constraints. Residual analysis and graphical interpretations further validated the stability and predictive reliability of ML-based corrosion assessments, demonstrating their feasibility as an alternative to traditional experimental methods. This study presents a comprehensive framework for integrating experimental corrosion testing, computational modeling, and CT-based defect analysis, offering a scalable approach to optimizing micro-lattice designs for corrosion-sensitive applications. The findings highlight the potential of LPBF-fabricated metallic lattices for aerospace, defense, and marine structures, where enhanced corrosion resistance, reduced material degradation, and predictive maintenance strategies are essential for long-term operational performance.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPrinting, Three-DimensionalSteelCorrosionMaterials TestingSurface PropertiesSteel

Identifiers

PMID40334230
PMCPMC12058171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.