Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40334228›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Institutional pressures and green supply chain integration intention: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms.

Bochen Zhang, Shukuan Zhao, Dong Shao, Xueyuan Fan, Shuang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bochen ZhangBusiness School, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5170-7199
Shukuan ZhaoSchool of Management, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Dong ShaoBusiness School, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.
Xueyuan FanSchool of Management, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Shuang WangBusiness School, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Green supply chain integration has become the key for manufacturing firms to cope with environmental challenges and gain sustainable competitiveness, but increasing the intention of firms to implement green supply chain integration is still a significant challenge. To respond to this issue, this study aims to theoretically discuss and empirically investigate the influence mechanism of institutional pressures on corporate green supply chain integration intention based on the theory of planned behavior. This study used a survey method to collect data from Chinese manufacturing firms, and the 292 finalized responses were analyzed using SPSS and AMOS. The findings indicate that institutional pressures, i.e., coercive and normative pressures, positively affect firms' intention to implement green supply chain integration. The study also exposed the executives' environmental awareness positively moderates the effect of coercive and normative pressures on green supply chain integration intention. Furthermore, executives' self-efficacy positively moderates the effect of normative pressure on green supply chain integration intention. The findings of this study help deepen the understanding of the formation mechanism of green supply chain integration intention, which provides practical insights for effectively promoting green supply chain integration and realizing green transformation and high-quality development of manufacturing enterprises.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesIntentionManufacturing IndustryAdultChinaCommerceFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40334228
PMCPMC12058135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.