ArticlePloS one2025
Zoom in on learning with a virtual microscope: A convergent parallel mixed-method study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowledge of histology is essential for many disciplines in professional health education. Virtual Microscopes (VMs) are increasingly becoming popular as a cost-effective teaching tool for histology. However, a lack of hands-on experience with traditional light microscopes and glass slides concerns many educators. Although studies have reported improvement or no difference in students' knowledge and/or performance using either virtual or optical microscopes, reports on the impact of VMs on students' understanding of magnification and orientation are scarce. We conducted a convergent, parallel mixed-method study to assess dental students' understanding of magnification and orientation after using a virtual microscope to study oral histology. Six hours of mandatory lab sessions and critical thinking assignment questions were designed for the 1st year students in the Doctor of Dental Surgery (DDS) program. Quantitative data were collected from students' performance in orientation and magnification-related questions in the summative assessments. Students' written responses to reflective questions were the qualitative data, analyzed using manifest content analysis. All 32 students accurately answered 3 out of 5 questions, requiring them to apply the knowledge of magnification and orientation. 30 and 29 students correctly answered the remaining questions, respectively. 97% of the class agreed to improve their understanding of magnification and orientation after using the VM. All (100%) students (n = 32) completed the reflective assignment, generating 64 meaning units. 17 codes were generated and compiled into seven subcategories, which were further condensed into two categories: refinement of mental models and enhanced learning. Although our study is limited by a small sample size, it sheds light on the strategies adopted by dental students to improve their senses of magnification and orientation while using a VM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.