Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40334211›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

'It's not just immoral!': The role of moral disengagement and incivility in dehumanising the transgressor of immoral behaviour.

Sofía Moreno-Gata, Ramón Rodríguez-Torres, Armando Rodríguez-Pérez, Verónica Betancor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sofía Moreno-GataDepartment of Cognitive, Social and Organizational Psychology, School of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6525-347X
Ramón Rodríguez-TorresDepartment of Cognitive, Social and Organizational Psychology, School of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Armando Rodríguez-PérezDepartment of Cognitive, Social and Organizational Psychology, School of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Verónica BetancorDepartment of Cognitive, Social and Organizational Psychology, School of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People who engage in immoral behaviour are often dehumanised. However, they also tend to justify their actions to convince themselves or others that their misconduct is morally acceptable. In this paper, we examine whether moral disengagement mechanisms influence the extent to which a transgressor is perceived as fully human. Further, we assess whether this perception varies based on specific characteristics of the immoral behaviour, such as incivility. To answer these research questions, we conducted two studies with online participants from Spain. In Study 1, participants (N = 302) evaluated a set of 63 behaviours. For every behaviour, they assessed the extent to which it violated each moral foundation from moral foundations theory, its level of incivility, and its potential to elicit dehumanisation. A correlation analysis showed that only the care and purity foundations, along with incivility, were associated with dehumanisation. These results allowed us to select behaviours that varied in incivility for Study 2. In Study 2 (N = 402), we tested the effectiveness of moral disengagement mechanisms employed by the transgressor depending on the level of incivility of the immoral behaviour. To this end, we employed a 3 (moral disengagement mechanisms: moral justification vs. displacement of responsibility vs. distortion of consequences) x 2 (incivility: high vs. low) between-subjects experimental design. The variance analyses showed that using moral justification or displacement of responsibility led to the least amount of dehumanisation, while distortion of consequences resulted in the highest level of dehumanisation. Additionally, immoral behaviours that were high in incivility led to greater dehumanisation than those that were low in incivility, regardless of the moral disengagement mechanism. Overall, our research highlights the significance of different moral disengagement mechanisms and civility as key factors that affect how bystanders perceive the humanness of moral transgressors.

Indexed as

DehumanizationIncivilityMoralsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocial BehaviorSpainYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40334211
PMCPMC12058180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.