Trial reportBlood advances2025
Zanubrutinib is well tolerated and effective in patients with CLL/SLL intolerant of ibrutinib/acalabrutinib: updated results.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04116437 (A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-arm Study of Zanubrutinib), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-arm Study of Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) in Patients With Previously Treated B-Cell Lymphoma Intolerant of Prior Treatment With Ibrutinib and/or Acalabrutinib
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on "EHA Guidelines on management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and Richter transformation".HemaSphere · 2026Article
- Current management of central nervous system involvement in chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma.International journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Aberrant expression of MERTK activates BCR via CD79a in CLL cells: alternative therapeutic strategy for relapsed/refractory CLL.Leukemia · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of the Role of Zanubrutinib for Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Oncology and therapy · 2026Review
- Early Ibrutinib Dose Modifications in CLL: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Real-World EVIdeNCE Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- Is Brukinsa (Zanubrutinib) a Safer Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- First-line treatment for CLL in the era of targeted therapy.Blood cancer journal · 2026Review
- Article
- Nature-Inspired Pathogen and Cancer Protein Covalent Inhibitors: From Plants and Other Natural Sources to Drug Development.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- B-cell receptor signaling and microenvironment crosstalk in mantle cell lymphoma.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025Review
- Therapeutic Impact of Zanubrutinib in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractBruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors such as ibrutinib (ibr) revolutionized chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) treatment, although treatment-related toxicities limit the use of some BTK inhibitors. Zanubrutinib, a potent next-generation BTK inhibitor, has higher selectivity than ibrutinib or acalabrutinib. The ongoing phase 2, single-arm BGB-3111-215 study investigates the safety and efficacy of zanubrutinib in patients with B-cell malignancies who are intolerant of ibrutinib and/or acalabrutinib. Here, results in patients with CLL/SLL are presented. Patients received zanubrutinib 160 mg twice daily or 320 mg once a day. With a 34.5-month median follow-up, 71 patients (ibrutinib intolerant only, n = 44; acalabrutinib intolerant only, n = 17; ibrutinib and acalabrutinib intolerant, n = 10) received ≥1 zanubrutinib dose. On zanubrutinib, 54% (28/52) of ibrutinib-intolerant patients and 70% (19/27) of acalabrutinib-intolerant patients experienced no recurrence of intolerance adverse events (AEs); 60% and 72% of intolerance AEs did not recur, respectively. Of recurrent ibrutinib-intolerance AEs, 64% were lower grade; 44% of acalabrutinib-intolerance AEs were lower grade. No intolerance AEs recurred at a higher grade with zanubrutinib. The most common recurrent ibrutinib-intolerance and acalabrutinib-intolerance AEs were fatigue and diarrhea, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) with zanubrutinib were fatigue (32%) and COVID-19 (28%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 61%, serious TEAEs in 32%, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation in 11%. Of 67 efficacy-evaluable patients, 94% experienced disease control: 30% had a best response of stable disease and 64% had a partial or complete response. These data demonstrate that patients intolerant of ibrutinib/acalabrutinib may benefit from switching to zanubrutinib therapy. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04116437.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.