ArticleJournal of pediatric psychology2025
Online environmental scan and content analysis of social stories about needle procedures.
Article in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Needle procedures are often difficult for autistic children. Preparatory education is an evidence-based strategy that is especially important for autistic children given they commonly struggle with unpredictability. Carol Gray developed Social Stories to walk autistic children through new/challenging situations step-by-step. Although needle-related Social Stories exist online, no research has investigated whether their content aligns with best practices for needle pain and fear management and Gray's guidelines for Social Story development.
objectiveThis study aimed to characterize the content of online Social Stories about vaccination and venipuncture. Specifically, the degree to which Social Stories (a) depict evidence-based/helpful and unhelpful coping strategies, (b) follow Gray's guidelines, and (c) depict accurate procedural steps, was examined in an exploratory manner.
methodsAn online environmental scan (systematic method of collecting and synthesizing information) characterized the content of Social Stories. A Google search was conducted, including free, English-language stories. After screening, two coders conducted deductive content analysis (>80 codes) with the sample of 82 eligible Social Stories; frequency statistics and quotes were derived.
resultsMost Social Stories focused on vaccination (89%). Social Stories commonly conveyed evidence-based strategies (e.g., 70% depicted distraction), accurate procedural information (e.g., >80% depicted step of needle insertion), and followed Gray's guidelines (e.g., 90% had meaningful titles). Several areas for improvement exist, including allowing for user customization and depicting less commonly shown evidence-based strategies like topical anesthetics.
conclusionSocial Stories may have utility for supporting autistic children and their caregivers through needle procedures. Examining effectiveness/outcomes of usage is a future research avenue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.