ArticlePloS one2025
The causal effect of workplace violence on mental health and work-related outcomes: a cross-sectional study using propensity score matching.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mental health experiences and help-seeking behaviors among Chinese psychiatric nurses: a descriptive qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Workplace violence against healthcare workers: a scoping review of reporting practices, barriers to reporting and institutional responses (2020-2025).BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Differences in hepatocyte-related indicators within occupational hazardous factor exposure between genders.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Risk Assessment of Workplace Violence Against Nurses: How Data Collection Methods Influence Results-A Swedish and Italian Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Network Analysis of Healthcare Worker Burnout: Organizational Factors Show Highest Centrality.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe prevalence of workplace violence in healthcare is 50-60%. While it has been linked to decreased job satisfaction, diminished quality of care, and economic burdens on healthcare systems, there are still major gaps. Previous studies ignored the Latin American perspective. Moreover, they neither offered causal evidence nor measured its impact on psychological outcomes. The objective was to evaluate the impact of workplace violence on psychological and work-related outcomes.
methodsA secondary analysis of Peru's 2016 National Healthcare Satisfaction Survey was conducted. This was a large-scale survey that used a stratified two-stage cluster sample design with a sample size of 5098 healthcare workers across all regions of Peru. Propensity score matching and Poisson regression models were used to assess the effect of self-reported workplace violence on outcomes, including depressive symptoms, burnout, sleep problems, work-life balance, and intention to quit.
resultsAmong 4,951 healthcare workers, workplace violence prevalence was 41.91% higher in physicians (47.4%) than nurses (37.8%). WV had a moderate effect on sleep problems (aPR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.45 to 2.97) and depressive symptoms (aPR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.47-1.86). It showed small to moderate effects on burnout dimensions and intention to quit (aPR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.13-1.41). The impact on work-life balance was small to negligible.
conclusionsWorkplace violence affects 4 in 10 Peruvian healthcare workers and is associated with adverse psychological and work-related outcomes. These findings highlight the need for improved reporting systems, targeted interventions such as policy development and training programs, and ensure adequate reporting systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.