ArticlePloS one2025
Empowering visually impaired students through innovative tools and accessible waste sorting education at the national level.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Expression of concern
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Waste separation is a critical strategy to address the intensifying global waste crisis. However, inclusive teaching strategies for visually impaired students remain limited. This study addresses this pressing gap by implementing an innovative intervention rooted in experiential learning principles. This approach integrates sound-equipped bins and waste sorting activity guides tailored to empower visually impaired students to independently and effectively separate waste. The research study employed a mixed-methods design encompassing three key phases: (1) training teachers to proficiently use accessible tools and to deliver comprehensive waste management education, (2) training visually impaired students through hands-on experiential learning to develop independent waste separation skills, and (3) evaluating behavior changes and skill retention among students after the training. The results demonstrated significant statistical improvements in knowledge (mean increase = 0.74, p < 0.001), attitudes (mean increase = 0.50, p < 0.001), and practical skills (mean increase = 0.55, p < 0.001) by students. These findings highlight the transformative potential of inclusive educational innovations to bridge existing gaps and promote self-reliance in waste separation among visually impaired learners. The study emphasizes the importance of adopting creative, evidence-based strategies to ensure inclusivity and sustainability in environmental education on a global scale. Policymakers and educators are urged to leverage these insights to advance environmental literacy and foster equitable participation in waste management practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.