Ab initio deep neural network simulations reveal that carbonic acid dissociation is dominated by minority cis-trans conformers.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Data-Efficient and Fast Machine Learning Molecular Dynamics through Integrated Active Learning and Knowledge Distillation.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026
   Article
2. Synergistic Zundel-Eigen mechanism for proton transport in protic ionic liquids unraveled by machine learning force fields and NMR spectra.National science review · 2026
   Article
3. Molecular dynamics simulations and spectroscopic study of the microstructural solvation shells, transport, and dielectric properties of the {KJournal of molecular modeling · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract