ArticlePloS one2025
Contribution of silicon fertilizer to soil and growth of Pak choi under reclaimed and brackish water cycling irrigation.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rational utilization and improvement of agricultural water resources has been and is still the focus of research on developing efficient and green agriculture in various countries. Thus, the exploitation and usage of non-traditional water resources hold substantial significance in water resources management and sustainable agriculture. However, their reuse may induce secondary soil salinization and impose stress on crops. To address the challenges of soil salinity and plant stress under brackish-reclaimed water irrigation, this study aimed to investigate the effects of silicon (Si) fertilizer application on soil properties and Pak choi (Brassica rapa L.) performance under two cycling irrigation sequences (RW-BW and RW-RW-BW) and three spraying frequencies (0-, 2-, and 4-day intervals). The findings displayed that the pH of each treatment (7.95-8.10) remained below 8.5, suggesting no risk of secondary soil alkalization. At the same spraying frequency of silicon fertilizer, the soil electrical conductivity (EC) significantly decreased with increasing irrigation times of reclaimed water. Silicon fertilizer improved soil structure and reduced sodium levels, alleviating salinity. The increasing spraying interval of silicon fertilizer provoked the diminution of the SAR and ESP, before rising again. But they were far below the threshold range, and there was no risk of soil salinization (15% and 13 mM1/2). The total silicon content of the soil and leaves increased under the different cycling irrigation conditions. Spraying silicon fertilizer on the crop leaf surface did not significantly influence the total silicon content of the soil. In conclusion, the application of Si-fertilizer beneficially impacts soil physicochemical properties and crop development and mitigates the risk of secondary salinization under brackish-reclaimed water for cycling irrigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.