SynthesisPloS one2025
The prevalence of depression in patients with lumbar degenerative disk disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Major Depressive Disorder on Somatic and Psychiatric Outcomes Following Elective Single-Level Lumbar Fusion: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Uniportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder characterized by significant pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. Depression frequently coexists with chronic pain conditions, intensifying symptoms and complicating management. Despite its clinical relevance, the prevalence of depression specifically among patients with lumbar DDD remains inadequately understood.
aimThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the prevalence of depression among patients with lumbar DDD and to identify potential sources of heterogeneity.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Academic Search Complete, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies published between 2015 and 2022. Studies reporting the prevalence of depression among patients with lumbar DDD were included in the analysis. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using random-effects models, and subgroup analyses were performed to investigate sources of heterogeneity.
resultsSeven studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 3485 patients with lumbar DDD. The pooled prevalence of depression was estimated at 20.19% (95% CI 8.94-39.46%). Subgroup analyses revealed significant variations in prevalence estimates across different geographic regions and assessment tools. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings, while meta-regression analyses did not identify significant associations between prevalence rates and factors such as age or year of publication.
conclusionsThis study highlights a substantial burden of depression among patients with lumbar DDD, emphasizing the need for comprehensive mental health assessment and management in this population. The findings contribute to a better understanding of the psychological comorbidities associated with lumbar DDD and have implications for clinical practice and future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.