ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2025
A PANoptosis-Based Signature for Survival and Immune Predication in Glioblastoma Multiforme.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePANoptosis is a concept of total cell death characterized by pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis. We aimed to explore the clinical significance of PANoptosis-related genes (PARGs) in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).
methodsExpression profiles of GBM were downloaded from the XENA database as a training dataset to construct a differentially expressed PARGs (DE-PARGs)-based risk score (RS) model, and the prognostic prediction role was validated in the CGGA database and GSE108474 using Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Meanwhile, independent prognostic clinical factors were screened, and their prognosis predictive activity was evaluated by a nomogram model. Furthermore, the relationships between key DE-PARGs and immune cell infiltration, as well as chemotherapy drug sensitivity were analyzed.
resultsThe RS model consisting of five DE-PARGs was constructed, including NOD2, NLRP2, NLRP7, GATA3, and TERT. ROC and KM curves confirmed the good potency of the RS prognostic model both in XENA database and GSE108474. Three clinical prognostic factors, including chemotherapy, pharmaceutical therapy, and RS model, were selected as individual prognostic factors. The nomogram model showed RS contributed most to survival probability, followed by chemotherapy and pharmaceutical therapy. In high- and low-risk groups, B cell memory, NK cell resting, and macrophage M1 had significant differences. As compared with the immune checkpoint therapy non-responder group, the responder involved a higher ratio of patients sub-grouped into the low-risk group. Three drugs between high- and low-risk groups had significant differences, including Cisplatin, Gefitinib, and Vorinostat.
interpretationOur data exhibit the prognostic value of PARGs in GBM and offer new insights for GBM pathogenesis and immune treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.