ArticlePloS one2025
Identification of medicinal plant parts using depth-wise separable convolutional neural network.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- FloraMediX: AI-enabled recognition and therapeutic profiling analysis of indian medicinal flora.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying relevant plant parts is one of the most significant tasks in the pharmaceutical industry. Correct identification minimizes the risk of mis-identification, which might have unfavorable effects, and it ensures that plants are used medicinally. Traditional methods for plant part identification are often time-consuming and require specific expertise. This study proposed a Depth-wise Separable Convolutional Neural Network (DWS-CNN) to enhance the accuracy of medicinal plant part identification. Furthermore, we incorporated the tuned pre-trained models such as VGG16, Res Net-50, and Inception V3 which are designed by Standard convolutional neural network (S-CNN) for comparative purposes. We trained variants of the Standard convolutional neural network (S-CNN) model with high-resolution images of medicinal plant leaves which contains 15,100 leaf images. The study used supervised learning by which leaf images are used as an identity for the other parts of the plants. We used transfer learning to tune training and model parameters. Experimental results showed that our DWS-CNN model achieved better performance compared to S-CNN models, with an accuracy of 99.84% for training data, 99.44% for F1-score and 99.44% for testing data, which improves in both accuracy and training speed. The presence of depth-wise separable convolution and batch normalization at the fully connected layer of the model made the model achieved a good classification performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.