SynthesisPloS one2025
Evaluating the effects of e-health interventions on mental health outcomes in individuals with breast cancer: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals with breast cancer (BC) often experience significant psychological distress throughout their cancer journey, and while e-health interventions show promise, evidence of their effectiveness remains limited. This systematic review addresses this gap by evaluating the effects of e-health interventions on mental health outcomes among individuals with BC. This study followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024543722). A comprehensive search was conducted from July to August 2024, using Scopus, Web of Science, and Ovid Medline databases. Studies were included if they: (1) applied experimental study designs, (2) implemented e-health interventions to improve mental health outcomes, and (3) focused specifically on individuals with BC. Two reviewers used Rayyan software and the predefined criteria for article exclusion and inclusion. Seven studies, predominantly from countries with high BC incidence rates and advanced healthcare systems, met the inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis revealed that e-health interventions improved psychological well-being, coping strategies, quality of life, physical health, and cancer-specific symptom management. However, diverse intervention designs and measurement tools hindered cross-study comparison. Many studies focused on general mental health measures, neglecting crucial aspects such as help-seeking behaviors, cognitive function, and concerns about cancer recurrence. Future research should standardize intervention protocols, ensure comprehensive outcome reporting, and expand mental health measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.