ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance for Small Biological Molecules in Complex Mixtures: Practical Guidelines and Key Considerations for Non-Specialists.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Tutorial on Mechanistic Modeling of Nonstatistical Reactivity: Example of Light and Heat Effects in the Garratt-Braverman/[1,5]‑H Shift of Ene-diallenes.ACS physical chemistry Au · 2026Article
- Integrating Metabolomics and Machine Learning for Advanced Chemical Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Evaluation of sample preparation methods for NMR-based metabolomics of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) ovarian fluid.Fish physiology and biochemistry · 2026Article
- Reaction Products Revised and Mechanisms Revisited with Machine Learning-Augmented Computational NMR.The Journal of organic chemistry · 2026Article
- Kinetics of dissolution and computational modeling of calcium oxalate monohydrate crystals in the presence of aqueous coffee bioactive extract compounds.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is a powerful analytical approach that enables both the structural determination and precise quantification of small molecules, such as metabolites. However, achieving precise quantification with NMR involves more than simply comparing integrals derived from NMR peaks to a concentration reference; quantitative NMR (qNMR) is a distinct and specialized application within the field. To obtain absolute quantitative results, spectra must be acquired under strict experimental conditions. Unfortunately, these acquisition parameters can be challenging to implement experimentally and often require trade-offs that compromise high throughput or practicality. In such situations, alternative strategies based on relative quantification and advanced software tools offer valuable solutions. This review aims to provide non-specialists with the key concepts and methodologies required for accurate NMR-based quantification in biomedical research, focusing on practical guidelines and experimental considerations. Unlike prior reviews, it prioritizes accessibility and practical implementation for researchers outside the field, emphasizing key experimental workflows and applications in biological and clinical studies. It clarifies the distinctions between absolute and relative concentration determinations and emphasizes the critical importance of sample preparation, pulse sequence selection, and rigorous control of experimental parameters. Recent technological advancements, such as high-field spectrometers and cryoprobes, have significantly enhanced the sensitivity and accuracy of NMR, enabling the reliable detection of low-concentration metabolites. Quantitative NMR thus offers critical potential in elucidating metabolic processes, supporting drug development, and aiding disease diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.