Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40333828›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Do young and older adult populations perform equivalently across different automatic face-trait judgements? Evidence for differential impacts of ageing.

Chithra Kannan, Alex L Jones, John Towler, Jeremy J Tree

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chithra KannanDepartment of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5017-8451
Alex L JonesDepartment of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3600-3644
John TowlerDepartment of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom.
Jeremy J TreeDepartment of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6000-8125

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate implicit personality trait judgements can be made from faces, but as yet the focus has been on young participants making judgements of young faces. The current study sought to explore if similar patterns of performance are seen across the age range, with both young and older adult groups. In addition, we investigated whether implicit trait judgements are associated with cognitive, and trait factors including face recognition, emotional expression perception, autism traits, and alexithymia traits. Across two experiments we explored the extent to which young and older adult populations were able to make accurate implicit associations from faces signalling two different traits - extraversion (positive) and neuroticism (negative). Interestingly, we find that young participants were accurate at making both kinds of automatic trait judgments, and older adults were equivalent to younger controls for the neuroticism personality trait but impaired with automatic extraversion judgements. In both studies, implicit associations were unrelated to any of the other cognitive and trait factors we measured. Based on this pattern of findings, we conclude that face-based implicit trait judgements utilise some independent processes to other face processing abilities, and that the interpretation of particular personality traits is differentially impacted by the ageing process.

Indexed as

AgingFaceFacial RecognitionJudgmentAdolescentAdultAgedExtraversion, PsychologicalFacial ExpressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonalityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40333828
PMCPMC12057949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.