ArticlePloS one2025
Evaluation approach of prefabricated components based on multi-layer complex network model combined with improved topsis method.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prefabricated buildings face greater and different prefabricated components throughout their entire lifecycle, leading to a significant increase in management difficulty. This article proposes an evaluation method based on a multi-layer complex network model combined with an improved topsis. Firstly, by combining relevant regulations, literature, and engineering experience, the factors affecting the connection of components in prefabricated building are identified and the relationships between these factors are clarified to construct a multi-layered complex network model. Secondly, complex network theory is applied to calculate and analyze the importance evaluation indicators of the model nodes. Finally, the nodes are evaluated using the entropy weight optimization topsis method, and key nodes are selected based on the comprehensive importance evaluation value, and simulation verification is carried out by attacking the nodes. A specific model is constructed and analyzed using a building in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province as an example. The study shows that:(1) By analyzing key importance evaluation metrics such as node degree, betweenness centrality, and closeness centrality, the critical nodes identified for the project are "G2," "G1," "S24," and "Q1"; (2) According to the comprehensive evaluation results using the improved topsis method, quality issues are the core cause of connection problems in prefabricated components, with the construction phase being the peak period for such issues; (3) The critical nodes play a significant role in maintaining the coordination and robustness of multi-layer complex networks, and the failure of these critical nodes undermines the network's cohesion and synergy. This study provides new insights and methods for the evaluation and management of prefabricated construction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.